Message #11

From: campbell@ufomind.com (Glenn Campbell, Las Vegas)
Subject: Wallace Antigravity Patents [LONG]
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:13:41 -0700

[I have some reservations about posting anti-gravity material on this
list, since it can get quite lengthy. This topic relates to Area 51
in that the Lazar & J-2 stories involve gravity propulsion systems,
but I am worried about the list being taken over by Tesla discussions
and pseudo science.  We'll see how it works out.

If you reply or post new messages regarding antigravity research,
be sure that "Antigravity" or a similar keyword appears somewhere
in the subject line.  Then people with no interest in the subject
can ignore the message.  --GC]

 ----

Subj:  Heavy reading about an "enlightening force"
Date:  Fri, Jul 26, 1996 8:18 PM PDT
From:  galevy@worldnet.att.net
X-From: galevy@worldnet.att.net (Gary)
To:     campbell@ufomind.com

Glen below I have included verbatim some material I found on the Wallace
patents.  I looked them up and found them extremely interesting and do
infact describe what is described in the material below a tested working
apparatus for the "kinesmatic force"/ antigravity.  I was wondering if
any of your wanderings or contacts could shed any light on these patents,
their inventor, the device etc.

--
 Gary Alevy
 galevy@pipeline.com

From robert@wwa.comTue Nov 14 19:25:53 1995
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 10:59:07 -0600 (CST)
From: Robert Stirniman 
To: david@ibg.uu.se
Subject: About Wallace AntiGrav Patents

From: robert@wwa.com (Robert Stirniman )
Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics.research
Subject: More Re Wallace AntiGrav Patents
Date: 13 Nov 1995 04:48:26 GMT

More About the Wallace Patents -- Anti-Gravity Technology

An article about the Wallace patents appeared in the British
magazine "New Scientist" in February 1980.  This was written
nearly ten years after Wallace was awarded his patents.
Here's a paragraph from the article.

    "Although the Wallace patents were initially ignored as
     cranky, observers believe that his invention is now
     under serious but secret investigation by the military
     authorities in the US. The military may now regret
     that the patents have already been granted and so are
     available for anyone to read."

I know -- it's a tease. And the rest of the article is the
same way. It provides barely enough information to jab your
psyche a little, and not nearly enough to get you off your
comfortable ass. And who knows who the anonymous party of
"observers" are, who believe that a secret investigation is
underway by the military -- or whether these observers even
exist at all. None the less, the New Scientist has a fairly
well established track record for accurate identification of
new science trends and issues. And, while the editors of this
British journal may be prone to enjoyment of gossip and
innuendo, it generally turns out be grounded in truth.

One thing they got right for sure: The patents are
available for anyone to read. Get them. Study them. No
doubt, Wallace got many things wrong about the physical
theory of his invention. But, he did discover something
very important. It does work.

Regards,
Robert Stirniman  (robert@wwa.com)


Subject: Re: More Re Wallace AntiGrav Patents
Followup-To:
sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics.research
Date: 13 Nov 1995 04:49:05 GMT

The Wallace Patents and Politics of Science

Henry Wallace was an engineer at General Electric about 25 years
ago, and developed some incredible inventions relating to the
underlying physics of the gravitational field. Few people
have heard of him or his work.

  US Patent #3626605 -- "Method and Apparatus for Generating
  a Secondary Gravitational Force Field"
  Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Ardmore PA   Dec 14, 1971

  US Patent #3626606 -- "Method and Apparatus for Generating a
  Dynamic Force Field"
  Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Ardmore PA   Dec 14, 1971

  US Patent #3823570 -- "Heat Pump" (based on technology
  similar to the above two inventions)
  Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Freeport NY  July 16, 1973

Wallace discovered that a force field, similar or related to
the gravitational field, results from the interaction of relatively
moving masses. He built machines which demonstrated that this
field could be generated by spinning masses of elemental material
having an odd number of nucleotides -- i.e. a nucleus having a
multiple half-integral value of h-bar, the quantum of angular
momentum.  Wallace used bismuth or copper material for his
rotating bodies and "kinnemassic" field concentrators.

Aside from the immense benefits to humanity which could result
from a better understanding of the physical nature of gravity,
and other fundamental forces, Wallace's inventions could have
enormous practical value in countering gravity or converting
gravitational force fields into energy for doing useful work.

So, why has no one heard of him? One might think that the
discoverer of important knowledge such as this would be
heralded as a great scientist and nominated for dynamite
prizes. Could it be that his invention does not work?
Anyone can get the patents. Study them -- Wallace -- General
Electric -- detailed descriptions of operations -- measurements
of effects -- drawings and models -- it is authentic. If
you're handy you can even build it yourself. It does work.
So what is going on?

One explanation I've heard is that Wallace ran up against
the politics of science, as dictated in the late 1960's by
the power-block at Princeton, who were primarily interested in
promoting the ideas of their main man, Einstein, and the
gravitation-is-geometry paradigm. Maybe there is some truth
to this story. Nowadays, there seems to be a piss-pot full
of theoretical physicists working on abstract geometrical
theories and other absurdly difficult mental masturbations,
while no one seems to have made any effort to provide a
theoretical explanation of the physics of a nuts-and-bolts
invention which could have enormous practical value.

Maybe we can blame it on the Princeton folks, but I'm more
inclined to believe that our defense industry black project
community has confiscated and suppressed knowledge of Wallace's
discoveries. All done of course under the most honorable and
sacred banner of national security. Well, it's been 25 years.
We ought to be real secure by now. Isn't it way past time for
some trickle down benefits to real people?

Wallace's inventions offer the potential of improving the
quality of life for everyone. Throughout history, political
suppression and hoarding of scientific knowledge has
inevitably resulted in a retardation of human advancement.
It continues today. When will we ever learn?

Regards,
Robert Stirniman (robert@wwa.com)


Followup-To:
sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics.research
Date: 13 Nov 1995 04:50:36 GMT

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Angular Momentum and Suppressed Science

There is an important relationship between intrinsic and
extrinsic angular momemtum, microscopic and macroscopic
angular momentum, and quantum and classical level angular
momentum.

A body which is spinning within a larger macroscopic body
which is also spinning will tend to align the axis of its
angular momentum with the spin axis of the larger body.
For example, a gyroscope located on the earth, unless it is
in a frictionless gimbal, with always try to precess due to
the rotation of the earth into alignment with the earth's polar
axis, at which point it will no longer precess due to earth
rotation.

Another example. A cylinder of magnetic material spinning
around its longitudinal axis will develop a magnetic field
proportional to is angular velocity (Barnett Effect), because
the angular momemtum of the electrons in the material will
attempt to precess and come into alignment with the macroscopic
axis of the spinning cylinder, which also brings into alignment
the magnetic moment of the electrons, some of which have unpaired
spins (ferromagnetic), resulting in generation of a macroscopic
magnetic field. Similarly, it is know that a static magnetic field
itself contains angular momentum -- and spinning the source of the
static field, whether a magnet or DC current loop, will result
in a corresponding increase or decrease in the field strength.

Another example is the inventions of Henry Wallace, which were
discovered and patented about 25 years ago, when he worked at
General Electric. Wallace found that an unusual thing happens when
you spin elemental material which has an odd number of nucleotides,
i.e. having an "un-paired" value of angular momentum in the nucleus,
resulting in a multiple integer of a one-half value of the quantum
of angular momentum (h-bar). The spin of the nucleus will begin to
line up with the macroscopic spin axis, and will create a force
field related to gravity -- which Wallace called the "kinemassic" field.

Maybe I've missed it, but I've looked seriously, and there seems
to be no information in undergraduate or graduate level physics
reference books which mentions the relationship between
macroscopic and microscopic angular momentum -- much less
provides any analysis or explanation linking quantum angular
momentum to macroscopic angular momentum. Why not?
How does quantum angular momentum become organized from a
microscopic to a macroscopic level? Has anyone ever published
any work about this? I can't find any.

Robert Stirniman
=============================================================

Here's an interesting reply I received to the above questions.

Date: Sun, 5 Nov 1995
From: James Youlton 
  To: Robert Stirniman 
  Re: Angular Momentum and the Barnett Effect

On Wed, 1 Nov 1995, Robert Stirniman wrote:
> Maybe I've missed it, but I've looked seriously, and there seems
> to be no information in undergraduate or graduate level physics
> reference books which mentions the relationship between
> macroscopic and microscopic angular momentum -- much less
> provides any analysis or explanation linking quantum angular
> momentum to macroscopic angular momentum.

You're catching on.  The subject of compound angular momentum, or
internal and external angular momentum, or intrinsic and extrinsic
angular momentum has been a repressed subject for about 2 and half
decades.  Add to that list, spherical pendulums, Coriolis effect, except
as applied to balistics and meteorology as used by the US military,
and Shafer's pendulum, that neat little device used as the artifical
horizon of aircraft.

> How does quantum angular momentum become organized from a
> microscopic to a macroscopic level? Has anyone ever published
> any work about this? I can't find any.

There isn't any that I know of, though back in the late fifties, there
was a fellow named Edward Condon at the University of Colorado who was
fairly proficient on the subject. So much so that he wrote the rotational
dynamics section, called noninertial dynamics at the time, of the
reference "The Handbook of Physics" which he also co-edited (Chapter 5).

I don't recall offhand who the publisher was (Harcourt/Brace?), though
it was endorsed by the American Institute of Physics.

Later, when Mr Condon was the head of the USAF project 'Blue Book', he
labored to suppress his own work when the directive was handed down from
the Navy's Turtle Island project.

James Youlton
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Note:

Edward Condon was not involved with project Blue Book, but was
involved in a different study of UFOs for the USAF which
resulted in termination of the Blue Book project. Condon's
first known involvement with study of UFOs was in 1943, when
he was engaged by the military to assess the FooFighter phenomena.
After the nationwide wave of UFO sightings in 1966, Condon
was appointed head of a new committee to "study" the problem,
The Committee for Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying
Objects. He proceeded immediately to ridicule and debunk
the idea of UFOs, even before the committee began it's
"investigation". There are many files of information now
circulating which document Edward Condon's sad turn from
scientific pursuit of truth to the dark side of politics.
But, that's another story.

Here's an excerpt about the Condon committee which comes
from the research report about UFOs prepared by Major
Brummet and Captain Zuick in May 1974 for the USAF Air
Command and Staff College.

    By September 1947, the United States Air Force (USAF)
  had become sufficiently interested in the growing number
  of UFO reports by reputable, respected citizens to estab-
  lish "Project Sign", later named "Project Grudge", and
  finally renamed "Project Blue Book", the Air Force program
  for investigation of UFOs. Project Blue Book remained
  in effect for over twenty-two years and investigated re-
  ports of 12,618 sightings. Unexplained sightings ranged
  between the official Project Blue Book report of 6 per
  cent to UFOlogist estimates of 54 per cent. Despite the
  wide variance in unexplained sightings, Secretary of the
  Air Force, Dr. Robert Seamans, announced the termination
  of Project Blue Book on December 17, 1969. The decision
  to discontinue UFO investigations was based on an eval-
  uation of a report prepared by the University of Colorado
  entitled, "Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Ob-
  jects," more commonly referred to as the "Condon Report";
  a review of the Condon Report by the National Academy of
  Sciences; past UFO studies; and two decades of Air Force
  experience investigating UFO reports. (6:141)"
 ....
    Project Blue Book was terminated on December 17, 1969,
  by Secretary of the Air Force, Robert C. Seamans, Jr.
  The decision to discontinue UFO investigations was based
  on a report prepared by the University of Colorado
  (Condon Report), a review of that report by the National
  Academy of Sciences, past UFO studies, and Air Force
  experience in investigating UFO reports.(21:297) Sec-
  retary Robert Seamans Jr., stated that the program "no
  longer can be justified either on the ground of national
  security or in the interest of science.(15:76)  Many
  experts disagree with the conclusion of the 1500 page,
  $539,000 independent Condon Study that took over two
  years to complete. The Condon Study concluded that :

          Nothing has come from the study of UFOs in
      the past 21 years that has added to scientific
      knowledge. Careful consideration of the record
      as it is available to us leads us to conclude
      that further extensive study of UFOs probably
      cannot be justified in the expectation that sci-
      ence will be advanced thereby.(1:2)

    One of the major critics of the Condon Study was
  an amateur UFO organization, The National Investigators
  Committee for Aerial Phenomena (NICAP). As indicated
  by the Condon Report , NICAP in the past has spent much
  effort in attacking Air Force UFO policies and attempting
  to influence Congress. NICAP warned members of the
  Colorado Project to beware less the Condon Project turn
  out to have been "hired to whitewash the Air Force."
     (End of excerpt from USAF research report)
=================================================================

Well there you have it. Has the military really been
suppressing new science knowledge for almost 50 years now,
or is it just another one of those wild and crazy conspiracy
rumors?

Regards,
Robert Stirniman  (robert@wwa.com)


Subject: Re: More Re Wallace AntiGrav Patents
Followup-To:
alt.alien.visitors,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics.rese
arch,alt.paranet.ufo
Date: 13 Nov 1995 04:51:02 GMT

Andrew Parle (parlea@stanilite.com.au) writes regarding
the Wallace inventions:
 >However, if that is not the case, then perhaps you should consider
 >the possibility that it does not work. This would then be sufficient
 >explanation for no-one ever hearing of Wallace or his inventions.

Yes, what you say would seem to be a most rational explanation,
maybe even the most rational explanation. That is -- the reason
no one has ever heard of Wallace, is simply because his inventions
don't work. And surely an invention like this discovered by a
scientist at a renowned company such as General Electric, which
was awarded two patents, and has enormous possible practical
value and unestimable consequences in physical theory and experiment
(we are talking about gravity control) -- would have been tested and
evaluated by at least one or more independent research organizations.

Guess what -- either it was never tested, or it was tested
and the results were classified. There is NO published
information about evaluation of the performance or non-
performance of Wallace's invention. So what looks more
rational -- was it never even tested, or did we just never
get to see the results. And why have we never seen the results?
What is more likely -- because it didn't work, or because
it did?

>So unless you can produce a working model, I guess the obvious
>answer is: just another inventor who thought he had made a
>discovery but in fact had made a mistake.

Wallace has already produced a working device, and you refuse to
even look at. Why would I expect that you would bother to look at
one that I might produce? If we were able to look at any kind of
test results for Wallace's device. That would be helpful. But
the thing is -- there aren't any tests to look at, at least not
in the public domain. Most peculiar.

Anyhow, if you prefer to entirely discard the idea that the invention
might actually work, with no serious consideration whatsoever to
the possibility that it's been suppressed. OK by me. It's refreshing
to see someone these days with so much faith in our defense and
national security agencies. And hey, don't worry about them UFOs
either. You know, that's all a bunch of nonsense too, right?

For anyone interested in new-physics and gravity control, I suggest
you start by studying the patents. Wallace's invention does work.

Regards,
Robert Stirniman  (robert@wwa.com)


Subject: Re: More Re Wallace AntiGrav Patents
Followup-To:
alt.alien.visitors,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics.rese
arch,alt.paranet.ufo
Date: 13 Nov 1995 04:51:23 GMT

Where to Get Copies of Wallace Patents

Patents awarded to Henry Wm Wallace for "anti-gravity" technology:

  US Patent #3626605 -- "Method and Apparauts for Generating
  a Secondary Gravitational Force Field"
  Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Ardmore PA   Dec 14, 1971

  US Patent #3626606 -- "Method and Apparatus for Generating a
  Dynamic Force Field"
  Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Ardmore PA   Dec 14, 1971

  US Patent #3823570 -- "Heat Pump" (based on technology
  similar to the above two inventions)
  Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Freeport NY  July 16, 1973

The original full text description and all drawings from every
US patent ever issued, is available on microfiche at patent
depository libraries throughout the country. It cost about
10 cents per page to make paper copies. You have to go there.
If you don't take the kids, you might enjoy it.

Regards,
Robert Stirniman (robert@wwa.com)

=================================================================
   PATENT AND TRADEMARK DEPOSITORY LIBRARIES
   ______________________________________________________________

   Patent and Trademark Depository Library Program
   United States Patent and Trademark Office
   Crystal Plaza 3, Room 2C04
   Washington, D.C. 20231
   Phone: 703-308-3924.
   _________________________________________________________________

Reference Collection of U.S. Patents Available for Public Use in Patent
Depository Libraries

   The following libraries, designated as Patent and Trademark Depository
   Libraries (PTDLs) receive current issues of U.S. Patents and maintain
   collections of earlier-issued patents as well as trademarks published
   for opposition. The scope of these collections varies from library to
   library, ranging from patents of only recent years to all or most of
   the patents issued since 1790 and trademarks published since 1872.

   These patent and trademark collections, which are organized in number
   sequence, are available for use by the public free of charge. Each of
   the PTDLs, in addition, offers supplemental reference publications of
   the U.S. Patent Classification System, including the Manual of
   Classification, Index to the U.S. Patent Classification and
   Classification Definitions, and provides technical staff assistance
   in using such publications in gaining effective access to information
   contained in patents and trademarks. CASSIS (Classification and Search
   Support Information System) and other CD-ROM products for searching
   patent and trademark information are available at all PTDLs.
   Facilities for making paper copies of patents and trademarks from
   either microfilm or paper collections are generally provided for a
   fee.

   Since there are variations in the scope of patent collections among
   the PTDLs and in their hours of service to the public, anyone
   contemplating use of the patents at a particular library is urged to
   contact that library, in advance, about its collection and hours in
   order to avert possible inconvenience.

State           Name of Library                  Telephone

Nevada          Reno: University of Nevada-Reno
                   Library                        (702) 784-6579





                                        Message #12

From: campbell@ufomind.com (Glenn Campbell, Las Vegas)
Subject: Mars Researchers Discover Ufology [Loon]
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 10:36:02 -0700

Reposted here to illustrate what we're already used to
at the border of '51. --G

 ----

From Stanford (Univ.) Weekly
http://daily.stanford.org/8-22-96/NEWS/NEWmars22.html

   TITLE: Researchers cope with life after 'life on Mars'

   Chemistry Prof. Richard Zare doesn't have to imagine anymore
   what it would be like to discover life on another planet. Two
   weeks ago the story broke that his lab, along with collaborators
   at the Johnson Space Center, had detected molecules
   suggestive of biological origin on a rock from Mars. Since that
   day, Zare has been wondering if there is life after life on Mars.

    "My whole life has been consumed by this," Zare said. "Of
   course I thought the results would be of interest to the public,
   but I had no idea it would cause such a fervor," he added.

   ...

   In addition to generating media interest and capturing the
   imagination of millions around the world, the announcement
   has brought the attention of fringe elements to the Zare lab. "I
   spoke with a man who saw rocks falling from a UFO and
   wanted to bring them into our lab for analysis. We've been
   getting calls like this all week," Zare said.

   Liz Edlund, Zare's secretary, has found her job description
   expanding. Not only has Edlund taken on the role of ad hoc
   publicist for Zare, but she has also found herself acting as a
   counselor for some of the more troubled callers. Zare
   complemented Edlund on her quick thinking when she "surfed
   the Web to find an alien abduction support group while talking
   with a distraught caller."

+------     U    F    O    M    I    N    D     -------+
| Glenn Campbell                 campbell@ufomind.com |
| AREA 51 RESEARCH CENTER - Las Vegas & Rachel, Nevada |
| UFOs  -  Gov't Secrets  -  Philosophy  -  Psychology |
| http://www.ufomind.com     Box 448, Rachel, NV 89001 |
+------------------------------------------------------+






Back to Main AntiGravity Links Page